“I have always been intrigued by people
who have a great capacity to trust God … If my strength depends on my capacity
to trust God, then I am not very strong!” Herbert O’Driscoll
I feel sorry for Brian Williams. Human memory is such a
fragile thing, and our ability to look into the mind of another human being is
so limited. I cannot know for certain what Williams remembers or misremembers
or has fabricated, but knowing my own short-comings in that regard, I cannot
bring myself to throw any stones.
I never read the Spider Man comics, but I remember in the
movie (the one with Toby Maguire) Peter Parker’s uncle reminded his nephew that
“With great power comes great responsibility” – and so there is an expectation
that people in the news business would exercise greater responsibility in doing
their fact-checking to ensure their stories are both reliably accurate and
trustworthy. That is a reasonable expectation.
As human beings, I know we like to think our memories are
pretty good, at least with regards to “important” matters. It may not matter
what we had for breakfast this morning or yesterday, but surely we would
remember an event like being “under fire” or what happened when we had that
“big fight” – wouldn’t we?
But I’m not so sure. Our egos are pretty fragile, and when
you add to that the point that “each of us is the hero in our own story” (I
wish I could remember who said that – it isn’t original with me), then it makes
sense that one might adjust his or her memory of events in a way that does
himself the least harm – or shows herself in the best light.
The interesting thing is that much of this is done
unconsciously or subconsciously. We often accuse people of lying, when in reality,
they are not remembering the event, but their recollection of the event – which
involves chemical and electrical processes within the brain itself.
Now, people DO lie. Of course they do. The child who insists
they did not take the cookie as crumbs fall from their face is lying. The man
who insists he did not rob the bank as the trail of bills falling from the
garbage bag to the tree behind which he is hiding is lying. People do
intentionally strive to deceive others for a variety of reasons, but I’m not
talking here about our capacity to lie.
Rather, I am talking about the way we communicate with one
another. We do not communicate through words, but through stories. As a
wordsmith, I am particular about the words I use, but they are my words and how
they help or hinder the reader are my responsibility. The words you use also
help and/or hinder my ability to hear and understand the story you are telling
me.
For instance, when a house is burglarized and a person says
they were robbed, the hairs on the back of my head stand up and I am liable to
throw a conniption because (as a former police office) I know there is a
technical difference between being robbed and being burgled. Robbery involves
taking something from a person by force or threat of force, whereas burglary is
the breaking and entering of a building to steal something. One is a crime of
violence against a person, the other a crime against property.
The point is, humans are story-tellers. That’s how we
communicate. If our story is unclear, people may ask questions for
clarification. As we clarify our stories, they change. We find different words,
we rearrange the order in which we tell the tale, or we may replace pronouns
with nouns and change the emphasis from one part of the story to another. We do
some of these things to make it clearer, but we also do them in response to our
audience.
To a humorist, laughter matters – that’s our chocolate. Reporters
are supposed to be objective, however, and therein lies the rub. News outlets
today are often shooting for market-share, and so stories are more often shaped
and arranged to amaze and amuse than to report “just the facts”.
Sadly, that’s the world we live in; fortunately, there will
always be those among us who can and will correct us, and that’s a truth we all
share in this, our valley.
No comments:
Post a Comment